Break the [wounds + unawareness] cycle and guard your descendents

Wound-assessment Worksheet
 - p. 2 of 2

"Scoring" Your Family-Tree
Assessment

By Peter K. Gerlach, MSW

HRbrass.gif (3108 bytes)

The Web address of this two-page worksheet is http://sfhelp.org/01/w3-f-tree.htm

       This concludes a two-page self-assessment worksheet on seeking clues in your family tree on whether you or key others may be unaware of significant psychological wounds from early-childhood deprivations and traumas. Reminder - please turn off your browser's popup blocker to access useful informational popups here.

 "Scoring" a Family Tree

       
The dozen Project-1 wound- assessment worksheets come from 30 years of clinical experience with over 1,000 troubled adults. The worksheets and related articles are also shaped by my own recovery  from a very low-nurturance childhood since 1986.

       As with the other wound-assessment worksheets, there is no research-based yardstick or scale that I know of to help reliably measure your results from this one. The more of the traits or events on page 1 that appear in an adult’s or child’s ancestry, the higher the odds they got too little emotional/spiritual nurturance in their early years, and automatically developed a dedicated false self to survive.

       We all have some of these ancestral traits and traumas. Watch for clusters of them among several members of a particular generation. My clinical guideline is: if there are probably or surely five or more of these factors in any person's current and past two generations, they’re probably significantly wounded (controlled by a false self). I know of no credible research that validates this (yet) - but see these research summaries on kids from "risky families" and most "mental-illness" starting by age 14.

        Your responses to the other 11 Project-1 checklists will validate or refute your findings here. "Significantly-wounded" means the person you assessed will probably

  • unintentionally pass on significant wounds to their descendents,

  • avoid genuine commitment or repeatedly commit to wounded partners, and

  • replicate low-nurturance (toxic) relationships until they...

  • commit to some form of effective personal wound-healing.

       Assigning any of these worksheet traits to an ancestor is a subjective decision. Deciding what "excessive" is in any family member is an opinion. To improve the objectivity of your research here, ask knowledgeable others (e.g. other kin, close family friends, involved health professionals) to reality-check your opinions about the existence of any trait you’re unsure of. The more traumatic (read terrifying or shameful) the trait, the more intense a reaction you'll probably get.

Alert: if you are significantly wounded, your governing false self is likely to minimize or deny some or many of these ancestral traits (reality distortion). Also, some of these traits may have been shameful  family secrets, and you were never told about them.

       Each of these family-tree factors or several together may have promoted excessive fears, shame, guilts, distrusts, hurt, confusion, rage, or anxiety in family kids of that generation. Whether that happened depends largely on whether family adults (a) were knowledgeable and aware enough to nurture the kids and themselves effectively at the time. 

        If they didn’t, these reactions may (vs. will) stunt healthy wholistic growth in minor kids. This promotes later relationship problems, "failures," and a downward spiral of chronic self-wounding experiences over time. Effective personal wound-recovery can stop this cycle, and promote restoring control of a chaotic personality to the person's wise true Self, over time.


 What Now?

  • If you’ve done one or all 12 of these wound-assessments (all is best), and you believe you are at least a moderately-wounded survivor of low childhood nurturance, then ...

Learn more - e.g. read the Project-1 guidebook Who's Really Running Your Life?" (xlibris.com), and selected other "Adult Child" books;

Identify the specific wounds you have, and work to clarify how these are affecting your (and your kids') lives; and …

Evolve and work a personal wound-recovery plan over time, with appropriate professional and other help. People in real (vs. pseudo) wound-recovery usually keep such plans as a  consistently high priority.

  • If you filled out one or more of these assessment worksheets focusing on an ex mate and you conclude that s/he probably or surely was or is significantly wounded, then ...

    That suggests (vs. proves) that you probably are too, because wounded adults and kids (i.e. their ruling subselves) seem to unconsciously choose each other - repeatedly; and...

    If you co-raised kids with that partner, those children are probably struggling with early versions of some aspects of false-self dominance and related wounding. That’s added incentive for you to learn about such wounding and effective recovery from it, for living and future descendents' sakes. For more perspective, see self-assessment worksheet #4.

  • If you feel your current partner is probably or surely ruled by a false self, discuss this concept and worksheet with them. Ask them to self-assess, using these Project-1 worksheets or equivalent. If s/he balks, postpones, pooh-poohs doing so, or vehemently disagrees, honestly re-examine why you’re in a primary relationship with this person.

Note: until a significantly-wounded person hits true (vs. pseudo) bottom, you can't persuade or force them to break their denials or want to start personal healing. Commonly, hitting bottom happens in midlife. Some wounded people never do. ...

       Wounded survivors of childhood deprivation and trauma often unconsciously commit to the wrong people, for the wrong reasons,  at the wrong time. Two wounded partners are at major risk of major relationship conflicts and stress, and sequential breakups - specially in complex, high-risk stepfamilies. And they're likely to re-create a low-nurturance environment for them and their minor kids, despite vowing not to.

        Your minor kids mutely depend on you co-parents to protect them against such massive loss and trauma - again

+ + +

       These 11 wound-assessment worksheets can’t conclusively "prove" low-nurturance childhoods and related psychological wounds. Together, they can provide clear, suggestive evidence that there may have been such. The high personal and co-parental stakes here merit getting an informed professional opinion, rather than relying solely on your (subjective) Self.

Resources

    • This overview of Project 1 - asess for false-self wounds and reduce any you find;

    • How to create a stepfamily map or genogram

    • A summary of young children's developmental needs

    • Understanding, learning from, and avoiding family secrets

    • These articles on increasing honesty (trust) and respect between your stepfamily members;

    • An introduction to effective communication (Project 2), which is essential for wound recovery and high-nurturance relationships and families;

    • Options for relating well-enough to significantly-wounded adults and kids; and...

    • These helpful books:

     Notes / Thoughts









Continue with self-assessment worksheet # 4: how typical members behave in low-nurturance vs. high-nurturance (wholistically healthy) groups.

<<  Prior page  /  Add to favorites  /  Print page  /  Email this worksheet's address  >>

colorbar

 home  /  site overview  /  directory  /  site map  /  Q&A  /  quizzes  /  solutions  /  site search  /  glossary

  research  /  free course  /  guidebooks  NEW  forums resources  /  feedback  and/or  subscribe  * copyright info

Updated  January 04, 2009