Continued...

Example: Confronting "Dad"

        Let's assume that you mates have agreed you want to confront your father, who adamantly rejects your stepfamily identity. Let's further assume that...

  • none of you have lived in a stepfamily before,

  • you've never talked with your Dad honestly about your prior divorce,

  • you have two minor kids living with you - his new stepgrandkids; and..

  • your Mom usually "goes along with Dad." and defers to his opinion here.

        You've asked if he agrees that you're all a stepfamily, and he blusters and say's something like "That's ridiculous. Step-schmep - we don't need to use silly words like that, we're just a family!"

        How might you do an effective confrontation

        This example is meant to illustrate your key options, not be a rigid formula. Adapt these steps to fit your personalities and unique situation. Use the numbers to help you partners discuss specific options together if you're each reading a copy of this page.

        Your odds for success rise if you mates plan a confrontation with your father, rather than barging in impulsively.

Planning Options

        Some links below will open a new window. Wait until you're done here before following any.

        1)  Do a "Self check." Are your and your partner's respective true Selves planning this assertion? If not, which subselves have taken over, and why? Do you each know how to free your Self (capital "S") to guide your personality? If not, lower your expectations about this confrontation succeeding, and give Lesson 1 higher priority together.

        2)   Assess Dad for significant false-self wounds. If you believe he's often ruled by a false self, see this for perspective and options.  

        3)  Affirm your rights to assert your needs, opinions, and values to Dad without undue guilt or anxiety. Refresh your belief that respectful confrontation here will (a) strengthen your self esteems and your relationship, (b) raise your stepfamily's nurturance level, and (c) improve your and your kids' long-term security and well-being;

        4)  Affirm Dad's dignity and rights to his own values and opinions. He's not wrong, he has needs and values that shape his stepfamily-identity rejection. He and his wife may also lack some factual information about stepfamilies since they've had no prior reason to learn it.       

        Option 5)  Get clear on what you mates need from the confrontation. Typical goals...

we need this assertion to come from both of us, not just you or me; and... 

we want Dad and Mom to hear why we think this identity-agreement is important for all of us. Then we need...

him and Mom to genuinely accept our identity as a stepfamily (or some equivalent term), and then to...

agree to use some role-titles we all agree on to refer to their relationship with their new daughter-in-law and two stepgrandkids - without sarcasm, ambivalence, or embarrassment; and...

we want Dad and Mom to feel respected and heard by us, and we want the same from them; and finally...

we want the kids and their other co-parents to know what we're doing here, and why.

        If we can't get these needs met, we'll settle for Plan "B"...

Mom and Dad agreeing to read the information about stepfamilies that we provide (page 1), and then discuss it with us; and then...

we need both of them to try out seeing and calling us a "stepfamily," to see what it "feels like." Either way (plan A or B), we need...

Dad and Mom's acceptance that we'll choose to use stepfamily terms and role-titles even if they don't agree with them yet (".. so Alex is your step-grandson, and you're his step-grandfather.").

        6) Decide on a time and place which will minimize distractions (like phones, kids, TV) and optimize effective mutual listening. Then you mates discuss who you should be present. If Dad is specially proud (competitive, defensive), perhaps a 1-on-1 is better than having Mom there. If you choose that, also decide if you want to tell Mom in advance of what you're doing. 

        A related decision is whether to have your kids or selected others present to (a) experience the confrontation process and (b) feel like they're important and included. Depending on many things, this is a chance to model how grownups resolve significant values conflicts respectfully for everyone.

        7)  Imagine compassionately what responses Dad is likely to make to your assertion, and prepare for them. If this is a potentially explosive situation, you mates can role-play how you'd (a) use empathic listening to his likely responses, and (b) re-assert your specific needs calmly and respectfully.

        8)  Be prepared to give Dad (or both parents) a copy of Common Stepfamily Myths and review it with him. This is the best way to factually illustrate the reason for accepting your stepfamily identity. Stay aware of the real goal: that all adults adopt realistic stepfamily expectations and avoid re/divorce trauma - specially for any minor kids in the family

        Option 9) Agree on a way of affectionately reminding your partner to stay focused if someone brings up another family issue before you're done with this family-identity assertion. This might be a hand signal, a sound, clearing your throat, or a word or two...  

        10) Note that effective assertions can bring up unfinished business - e.g. Dad's feelings about your divorce. If that happens, be prepared to shift gears to problem solving the new issue, and deferring resolution of this identity-conflict to another time. Stay flexible and resilient, and pace yourself... "Progress, not perfection..."

        11) Do an attitude check: are you looking at this confrontation as a chance to improve your stepfamily relationships long term, or is this an onerous, scary chore that you (your ruling subselves) resent? The former usually has higher odds of success. Finally...

Act on Your Plan

        Assert your opinions and primary needs to Dad (and any others), and assess the outcome. Did you (a) get enough of your needs met (b) in a way that felt good enough? Affirm your effort, and clarify what you learned together.

        Notice what you're thinking and feeling now. Have you ever planned an assertion as thoroughly as this, in a high-emotion conflict? If it looks like a lot of work, it probably is. And the payoffs are probably high for you all, long term. Do you care enough about your stepfamily relationships to invest this effort? Your actions demonstrate your real priorities here more than your words.

Example: Handling "Resistances"

        Here's how a new stepfather might respond to his Dad's resistances to "acknowledging that we're a stepfamily." He uses...

  • an attitude of genuine mutual respect, and...

  • communication awareness, assertion and empathic listening skills.

        In this example, "You" are the stepdad, your new wife is Penny, your Dad is Frank, your Mom is Janet, and your resident stepkids are Nate and Becky. You're asserting to your father with Penny present, and your Mom and the kids absent.

You - "Dad, we really need your help with something. You've said you don't feel it's necessary to call us all a stepfamily, and we do. Will you listen to our reasons?"

Dad - "I still feel it's nuts..."

You - "You see no point to this." (Empathic listening - Dad nods and grunts in agreement, feeling heard.) "And we really need you to listen to our reasons - will you do that now?" (Patient re-assertion)

Dad - "Well don't take all day about it. What do you want to tell me?"

You - "As you know, a stepfamily has at least one stepchild and one stepparent. That's true of us. I'm obviously not the biological father of Nate and Becky, yet I'm co-parenting them with Penny. I'm their stepfather, Dad, and they're my stepkids."

Dad - "I understand that. What I don't see is why you need to use this term 'step.' Why not just say they're 'our kids'?"

You - "You see no value to using 'step' here." (Empathic listening again - respectfully summarizing what he said, without judgment, explanation, or question).

Dad - "Right. What's the big deal - am I missing something here?"

You - "Yes you are. Penny and I have been reading about stepfamilies, Dad. They're more likely to divorce than first marriages - and we don't want that to happen to us and the kids. Once is enough!"

Dad - "Mm. I didn't know that. And you think us calling ourselves 'steppeople' is going to prevent that?"

Penny - "Not by itself, Frank, no. What we're learning is that if we don't use stepfamily titles - like stepson, stepfather, and stepgrandfather (smile), we risk thinking and acting like an intact biological family."

Dad - "Well what's wrong with that? A family's just a family - people living together, and so on..." 

You - "You feel there's no difference." (Empathic listening - Dad nods). "Dad, we just learned that normal  stepfamilies like ours are different than average biological families in over 60 ways! That means that standard biofamily norms and expectations often don't work in a stepfamily. They cause problems, and Penny and I don't want 'em for any of us!"

Dad - "I don't get it. What's so different about a stepfamily?"

Penny - "Yeah, we didn't get it either, until we began to read and think about this." (She hands Frank copies of this and this.) "Would you and Janet please take the time to read these? They're about all of us. Then let's talk again about who we are, and what to call each other. We really want our marriage and this stepfamily to work!"

Dad - "We want that too, Penny. We sure don't want a repeat of... well, we don't want to go through that again. Sure, we'll read this. Doesn't look real complicated."

You - "Thanks, Dad. We really need your and Mom's help here."

        Does this read like a "confrontation"? How would you have navigated this exchange? Notice how this sequence could have turned out much different if "You" didn't use empathic listening to acknowledge "Dad's" views and feelings. The normal alternative is to argue ("Yes, but..."), interrupt, lecture, generalize, accuse, get irritated and impatient, and/or bring up old baggage ("You never listen!"). 

        Because you expected Dad to resist, and didn't judge him badly for it...

  • you avoided an argument and some "bad feelings."

  • Dad felt heard (respected), so his E(motion) level stayed "below his ears" and...

  • he could hear you and Penny.

When that happened, he was willing to do what you asked - read about stepfamilies, and perhaps try call-ing you all a stepfamily and acknowledging his strange new role as Nate and Becky's stepgrandfather.

        If your Mother and/or anyone else had been present, the process would have taken longer, but the theme would be the same:

  • prepare well together with your partner,

  • expect resistances and know how to handle them (use empathic listening and re-assertion, unless you get new information);

  • help each other stay focused on one issue until you're done,

  • use a genuine mutual-respect attitude with all participants,

  • give new information about stepfamilies as appropriate, to justify your assertion, and...

  • follow up on any agreements.

        Keep your perspective: if balky relatives agree to use stepfamily terms but aren't motivated to learn what your identity means, you're still at risk of their unconsciously causing stress by using biofamily expectations.

A Special Case - Confronting Ex Mates

        Most stepfamilies form after the divorce of one or both new mates. A common problem is trying to co-parent effectively despite residual problems between ex mates. Where this is true, confronting a resistant ex mate to agree to your stepfamily identity can be specially hard. For resolution options, see this after you're done here.

        A key requisite here is new mates and inlaws accepting that the ex mate/s and all their relatives are full members of your multi-home stepfamily - i.e. accepting that their feelings and needs deserve as much consideration as your own.

        If either of you mates or your biorelatives have trouble accepting this, you probably bear psychological wounds - and/or you have not grieved your divorce (and re/marriage) losses well enough. Make Lessons 1 and 3 a high priority for all your sakes, and discuss this after you finish this article..

 Recap

        Many stepfamily adults and kids are unaware of being in a multi-home "stepfamily," or they resist accepting their step-identity. Even if they accept it, many don't know what being in a stepfamily means.

        This Lesson-7 article explains why accepting your step-identity is vital. It also offers guidelines, resources, and an illustration to help co-parenting mates assert their stepfamily identity to resistant or unaware relatives. This identity acceptance is required for all family members to form realistic expectations about their alien new roles and complex web of relationships.

        After inviting all your members to accept their stepfamily identity and learn stepfamily norms, then seek agreement on who belongs to your stepfamily, and evolve and implement a practical biofamily-merger plan.. 

+ + +

        Pause, breathe, and reflect - why did you read this article? Did you get what you needed? If not, what do you need? Who's answering these questions - your true Self, or ''someone else''?

This article was very helpful  somewhat helpful  not helpful 

  Keep studying Lesson 7!

Share/Bookmark  Prior page  /  Lesson-7 links

colorbar

 site intro  /  course outline  /  site search  /  definitions  /  chat contact  copyright info

Updated  February 28, 2013